On 17 November 2025, a special International Crimes Tribunal (ICT-1) in Dhaka delivered a landmark verdict, sentencing former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to death for crimes against humanity. This ruling immediately ignited intense national and international debates regarding justice, politics, and human rights.
Background of the Verdict
The judgment came after months of hearings, where ICT-1 examined evidence and testimonies surrounding the crackdown on student protesters during the July–August 2024 uprising.
Key allegations included:
-
Ordering lethal force through helicopters, drones, and live ammunition
-
Command responsibility over state forces during the protest crackdown
-
Failing to prevent or punish acts of violence committed under government authority
The tribunal found Hasina guilty alongside former Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan Kamal, who was also sentenced to death. Former police chief Al-Mamun, who cooperated with investigators, received a five-year sentence.
The court also instructed that victims and families receive “adequate compensation.”
Reactions and Impact
1. Political Tension
The verdict heightened political stress across Bangladesh, with many calling the ruling “politically motivated.”
2. International Concerns
Human rights organizations raised concerns about transparency and fairness in an in-absentia trial.
3. Domestic Security
Following the announcement, security was significantly tightened in Dhaka.
4. Future Political Landscape
With elections scheduled for February 2026, this verdict may reshape political dynamics, including the position of the Awami League.
Why This Verdict Matters
-
It sets a precedent in holding former heads of government accountable for human rights violations.
-
It highlights the debate over state violence, protester rights, and democratic accountability.
-
It may affect Bangladesh’s political stability and international relationships for years to come.
Conclusion
The death sentence against Sheikh Hasina marks one of the most dramatic legal outcomes in Bangladesh’s modern history. Regardless of political alignment, this verdict will continue shaping national discourse on justice, power, democracy, and human rights. As appeals progress and elections near, the nation enters a critical chapter.
